Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for seven years and fines for 50,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Defendant

A above.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, during the period from December 9, 2006 to February 27, 2007, during which he/she had overall control over the overall affairs of the tentative name promotion committee while working as the chairperson of the I Residents' Self-Governing Center for Housing Reconstruction Improvement Projects (tentative name) in the area around the I Residents' Self-Governing Center.

From February 28, 2007 to September 28, 2009, the Defendant became a “promotion committee” under the direction of Defendant A with the approval of the authority on February 28, 2007, and was elected as the “promotion committee” chairperson by the Defendant A’s withdrawal alone.

The general supervision over the duties of the promotion committee was over all while serving as the chairperson.

From September 29, 2009 to April 2015, the Defendant became a “cooperative” with the authorization of the authority on September 29, 2009, and at the time, Defendant A was elected as the head of the “cooperative”.

A general manager over the overall affairs of the partnership while working as the president of the partnership.

Defendant

B On April 21, 2007, the representative director of the J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “J”) selected as the specialized management company for the housing reconstruction improvement project in the housing reconstruction improvement project district (hereinafter referred to as the “maintenance project”).

1. On June 5, 2007, Defendant A received 100,000 won (4,900,000 won) through K of the site chief of the JJ, in response to the solicitation from the above B at the office of the promotion committee office located in Ansan-gu I during the period of Gyeyang-si, the Defendant received 49,000 won of the cashier’s checks under the pretext of the honorarium.

The purpose of the solicitation is to “(State) to provide convenience in relation to the execution of various duties by the Court (State) Court in order to enable the Court to receive the services for the housing reconstruction improvement project, and in the future (State), to provide the convenience in relation to the implementation of various duties.”