A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2014, at around 13:45, the Defendant driven B 130 automobiles under the influence of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.321% in a section of about 5km from the 5km of the 13:55m of the same day from the fluence of the court Eup at the time of Pakistan to the flusium of the Plusium of the 13:55m of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on the state of running a motor vehicle on a motor vehicle;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor under Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which relate to criminal facts, (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200 million won as of April 6, 2004; Supreme Court Decision 200 million won as of January 30, 2009; Supreme Court Decision 200 million won as of January 30, 2009; Decision 200 million won as of January 30

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (the grounds for probationary mitigation below);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant repents his mistake, that the same criminal power was sentenced in 2004 and 2009, that there was no history of penalty heavier than

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;