A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 6288] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CNF car.

On October 17:51, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car and let the 452-1 side road of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the local government of the city of the local government

However, since there is no separate signal apparatus, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as reducing speed and making a left turn by checking well the front left.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to turn to the right by the negligence of the victim D (the age of 30) who was driving on the right side of the vehicle due to the negligence of the defendant, and the front part of the E-wheeled vehicle operated by the defendant was shocked with the front part of the vehicle operated by the defendant.

As a result, the above victim suffered bodily injury, such as catitis that requires treatment for about six weeks.

[2014 Highest 571] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CNF car.

On January 10, 2014, the Defendant, while driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.087% of blood alcohol concentration, and driving the said vehicle in front of the post-high school located in the administrative department of the local-Eup in the local-Eup in the local-nam city in the local-nam city in the ethic City in the ethic City, and attempted to escape without taking necessary measures even if it damages the repair cost of approximately KRW 1,580,762 to the front part of the said vehicle, due to occupational negligence, which neglected to perform the duty of care in front of the next road in the local-nam city in the local-nam city in the ethic City in the ethic City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on actual condition;

1. Statement of police statement related to D or F;

1. A report on the state of the operation of a motor vehicle;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. A written diagnosis on D;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 3(1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;