A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 27, 2015, at around 22:11, the Defendant: (a) expressed a drinking to the head of the police box of the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, B apartment 308 Dong 603, and (b) assaulted D, who was dispatched to the site after having received a 112 report, that “I am at the close of the entrance,” that “I am at the seat of the police box of the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, who was sent to the site, “I am at the seat of the opening, I am at the seat of the opening, I am at the night, I am at the seat of I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the statutes governing the place of service of the damaged department, police box, etc.;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

2. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances) of the suspended sentence (the scope of the recommended sentence) is [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act]. There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months), the basic area (6 to 6 months of the obstruction of performance of official duties) (the special person) (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence is against the defendant’s depth, and the fact that there is only a previous conviction