[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On July 21, 2017, the Defendant has operated another vehicle on the road in front of a DNA convenience store located in C at the early of the early of July 21, 2017.

As E and parking problems have become a vision, FJ G was dispatched to the above site after receiving a report on drinking alcohol driving.

At the time, the police officer saw that the defendant was smelled and snicked on the face of the defendant, and that the reporter made it clear that the defendant would be released from the driver's seat.

Defendant, such as horses, was driven under the influence of alcohol;

Since 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant demanded that the Defendant comply with the drinking alcohol measurement by inserting the breathm to four times during the period from 22:27 on the same day after the Defendant was arrested as an offender, but the Defendant rejected it by taking a breath, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's demand for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds.

B. On July 21, 2017, at the same place as the above paragraph (a) around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) obstructed Defendant-friendly B from performing official duties; and (b) even after he was arrested as a current offender, G, a police officer, continuously demanded a alcohol measurement; and (c) the Defendant’s failure to perform official duties, as described in paragraph (2), demanded the police officer to continue to conduct a alcohol measurement.

“In doing so, the part of the above police officer’s title was calculated once at the same time by hand (V) and was assaulted by the breath’s breath with the breath’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of public order of police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigations.

2. Defendant B requested a police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the F District Unit, dispatched as described in paragraph (1), to conduct a drinking test to Defendant-friendly job offering A on July 21, 2017, in front of the D convenience store located in Seocho-si, Seoul, and around 21:55, the Defendant demanded the said police officer to conduct a drinking test to Defendant-friendly job offering A.

(e).