A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a public prosecutor or prosecutorial investigator, and after obtaining financial information from the victims through investigation, transfers money in the name of another person secured in advance by using such information to a large account in the account of the victims, or a cash withdrawal of a financial fraud organization that has the victims directly transfer money in his/her account to a large account (hereinafter referred to as “scaming organization”).

On March 6, 2015, the Defendant offered a proposal that he would withdraw the money deposited in the account under the name of the Defendant from the non-member of the above Bosing Organization, and conspired with the employees of Bosing singing singing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing

In accordance with the above public offering, the personnel of Bosing Tishing will transfer money to a virtual account, with phone call, to the victim J “the prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office (the prosecutor of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office) who is involved in the illegal case under the name of the party, and has to verify whether the party is a victim or a suspect.”

Unless cooperation is made, a false statement stating that the money detained with a detention warrant issued and deposited in the bank is to be seized. It received 35 million won from the injured party to the Suhyup account (F) in the name of the accused.

On March 6, 2015, the Defendant sent the money of KRW 35 million deposited into the water cooperative account under the name of the Defendant to the above assistant staff who was waiting in the atmosphere in the atmosphere, on March 6, 2015, at 300, Seo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and at 300,000 won deposited into the water cooperative account under the Defendant’s name.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the employees of the phishing type, obtained a total of KRW 35 million and received a delivery of KRW 5 million in return.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Requests for the provision of financial transaction information;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (No. 5, 6)

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;