A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Punishment of the crime

In around 2009, the Defendant introduced the FPC room operated by the victim E in the vicinity of the D University located in Busan Metropolitan City, as “a professor at D University G,” and introduced the victim E as “a professor at D University culture faculty,” and received the victim E through the victim E., the victim’s female job-care victim H and H father.

1. Fraud to victims E;

A. On September 2009, the Defendant loaned money to the victim at the J agency operated by the senior mother of the victim in an address of the Daegu-gu or lower-gu, Daegu-gu, 2009, because the Defendant: (a) borrowed money from the victim “I am to the senior mother of the width; (b) there is no money; and (c) there has been an urgent look at the vehicle.

It is a public official who will receive a loan from a public official.

“.....”

However, the defendant did not have served as professor of D University, and even if he did not borrow money from the injured party due to lack of occupation at the time, he did not have the ability to repay the money, and there was no intention to receive the loan under the name of female student.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, received from the victim, a remittance of the sum of KRW 2 million around September 22, 2009, KRW 2 million around October 14, 2009, KRW 1.5 million around October 28, 2009, KRW 1.5 million around November 4, 2009, and KRW 1 million around November 4, 2009, to the Daegu Bank account in the name of the victim used by the Defendant.

B. On April 29, 2010, the Defendant should pay the victim a deposit for lease on a deposit basis at the FPC room.

The term “money lending ......” was called as “money lending.”

However, as above, the defendant merely carried out university professors and did not have the intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to the lack of certain income.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 7,199,00 on the same day to the Daegu Bank account in the name of the victim used by the Defendant under the pretext of borrowing from the victim.

2. Fraud against the victim H.