logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.04.24 2013고정1906
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 8, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act, who is engaged in driving of a passenger motor vehicle of the B Mung-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, driving the above vehicle on the road in front of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and driving the vehicle along four-lanes from the area of distribution to the area of green yellow distance. The Defendant changed the three-lanes.

In this case, the defendant who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to confirm the course of the motor vehicle and drive the motor vehicle safely so that it does not impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles in the direction of changing the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the injury to the victim E (V) who was on the right side of the D-si vehicle driven by the victim C (the age of 57) who was on the same side as the time she violated the duty of care of change of course of the lane, and caused the collision between the two-day wheels of the D-si vehicle and the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, thereby causing about two-day medical treatment to the above C. The Defendant damaged the victim E (the age of 24) of the passenger E (the age of 24) who was on the seat of the damaged vehicle by causing about two-day medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle by causing about 416,00 won at repair cost.

2. On April 8, 2012, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as a holder of a shower passenger car B, was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance on the road. On April 8, 2012, the Defendant operated the foregoing motor vehicle on the road that was not covered by mandatory insurance from the road located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the road that is in front of the Hanmandong Station located in Seongdong-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. CWritten statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis, a written estimate for DNA vehicles 1.

arrow