logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.08.14 2018가단6001
양수금
Text

1. Defendant B shall deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet to Defendant B’s vice house.

2. The defendant corporation.

Reasons

1. On August 12, 2015, the gist of the Plaintiff’s claim: (a) the Plaintiff received from Defendant B a claim for the return of the lease deposit (the deposit of KRW 22.5 million, the lease period: October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015) with respect to real estate indicated in the separate sheet, which the said Defendant had against the Defendant’s house Non-permanent, Co., Ltd.; and (b) on August 13, 2015, the fact of the claim transfer was served on the Defendant Non-permanent Housing Co., Ltd.; (c) as the above lease period expires, the Defendant B is obligated to deliver the said real estate to the Defendant Non-permanent Housing Co., Ltd.; and (d) the Defendant Non-permanent Housing Co., Ltd. is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of the deposit less overdue rent, management fee, etc

2. Determination:

A. Judgment by public notice against Defendant B: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act

B. The defendant company does not dispute the plaintiff's claim against the defendant non-permanent housing company

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is accepted on the grounds that all of the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.

arrow