A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 06:20 on June 15, 2013, the Defendant, who violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) was faced with a shoulder on the ground that the Victim F (year 27) was friendly E in front of the “D convenience store” located in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju, and that he was faced with a shoulder on the ground that the Victim F (year 27) was friendly E.

Accordingly, the defendant and E, who entered the above convenience store by pushing the defendant and E, threatened the victim with the victim, and threatened the victim with drinking, and the defendant was faced with the two arms and back head after leaving the victim's bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with E.

2. At around 07:20 on June 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) requested a voluntary movement from the G District H affiliated with the G District G District at the Gwangju Northern Police Station G District; (b) accompanied the G District; and (c) made the document of voluntary behavior to be prepared; (c) the Defendant entered his name in the “F” column of the document of voluntary behavior with a black pen for the purpose of hiding his/her personal information; and (d) made a written signature on the side of the part stated above “I”.

Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged the above I's voluntary act of action, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), forged a written intent of voluntary action as stated in paragraph (2), and subsequently exercised the forged private document by submitting a written intent of voluntary action to a police officer, a police officer belonging to the above police station, who knew of the forgery, as if the document was genuine.

4. On June 15, 2013, the Defendant in violation of the Resident Registration Act asserted that, while being investigated by the relevant police station and office of the Gwangju Northern Police Station, a police officer, belonging to the said police station, his fingerprints was different from each other, and that, when being asked to have his fingerprints carried out several times, the Defendant forged as described in paragraph (2).