logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.04.22 2014고단3523
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 1, 2014, at around 00:20, the Defendant destroyed the damage of property by putting a tree interest in the Defendant’s wife in a ward due to the Defendant’s late returning home from the Defendant’s house room at Eunpyeong-gu Seoul E Apartment 244, 102, on TV, thereby damaging the market price of the victim and the Defendant’s joint ownership of TV.

2. The Defendant reported the occurrence of domestic violence at the same time and at the same time as in the preceding paragraph, and tried to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender by sending the Defendant to the scene, such as H and two police officers assigned to the Seoul Eunpyeong Police Station G police box, etc., and “I am bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit her hand with the victim’s body body and shoulder at one time, with the victim’s hand, committed assault, such as the two bit son son her left part by hand, and the Defendant continued to commit assault by hand at one time and one time, with the victim’s left part buck her face her face at one time, with the victim’s face her face, and at the same time, with respect to the treatment of the victim’s injury and injury of the victim, the victim’s legitimate arrest and treatment of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Photographs of destruction and damage of property (the fact of paragraph (2) in the market);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. A H statement;

1. The Defendant alleged that the instant TV set forth in Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the Defendant was not jointly owned by the Defendant and the victim, but the Defendant and the victim commenced a marriage from around 2004, and the instant TV was purchased at around 2010 thereafter. The Defendant and the instant TV purchased at around 2010.

arrow