beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 21, 2016, the Defendant filed a petition for recovery of his/her right of appeal after he/she was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on March 31, 2017, which became final and conclusive on April 8, 2017 and completed the execution of the said sentence on May 10, 2017, by being sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court.
From 2012 to 2015, the Defendant was unable to engage in economic activities under his/her name as a bad credit holder, and around KRW 250,00,00 without any special property. The victims invested in other businesses with a rental deposit, monthly rent, borrowed money, etc., and planned to transfer the name of the vehicle and return the borrowed money thereafter. However, even though the Defendant was planned to pay profits from the victims, the amount of the investment in the business was faced with the shortage of funds due to the increase in the amount of the investment in the business, the amount of the loan received from the victims, and the amount of the loan received from the victims was to be repaid to other customers in the form of “a prevention” lending the rental money to other customers.
1. Fraud related to purchasing vehicles;
A. The victim D (1) on December 2012, 2012, the Defendant would purchase the victim D’s “Iskin house with the trade name located in the Jung-gu Seoul metropolitan area at which it is impossible to know the trade name.”
‘False speech' was made.
However, the facts are that the defendant did not have the intent or ability to purchase the BMW car due to the above circumstances, and if the victim D knew of such circumstances, he did not pay his own vehicle or money for the purchase of the vehicle.
Defendant is the victim as above and the victim’s car at the time of the victim’s bMW 520 to exchange with BMW 520. On December 2012, 2012, Defendant was issued with a 40,000,000 driver car around the end of February, 2013, and received KRW 5,00,000 as a tax for the acquisition of the vehicle.
(2) (A) On August 2013, 2013, at a place where it is impossible to identify the location, the victim’s phone calls to the victim D.