Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

【2013 High Court Decision 6302】

1. On October 31, 2012, between 13:40 and 14:10, the Defendant interfered with the business, the Defendant demanded the victim E (nb, 59 years of age) operating the said restaurant within the D cafeteria located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to “the 59-year-old lending of money for the bill is the same as the default on payment of bills, but the victim refused to do so. However, the Defendant was sufficiently divided by the reason that he did not have a large amount of money. As such, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business by force of the victim by force for about 30 minutes, such as: (a) a meal deposit located on the D 8 cafeteria, which was pushed off on several walls; (b) a meal deposit was pushed down; (c) threatening the victim; and (d) threatening the victim, as the victim might be at the time, and (d) a threat of how and how I will see it during that period; and (c) interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. Damage to property;

A. On April 30, 2013, around 15:00, the Defendant demanded the victim E to “A” at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, at the victim’s location, “A vehicle has not exceeded 1% and exceeded 5:00,000 won has borrowed money. If the vehicle left, 00 million won need to be loaned.” However, the victim’s refusal was defective, and the victim collected the main electronic in the restaurant, thereby impairing its utility by destroying the property so that the repair cost can be avoided.

B. On August 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 21:08, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1); and (b) on the ground that the victim E was “contestable” but the victim refused to do so, the Defendant: (a) laid four chairs inside the restaurant on the floor and damaged the property so that the repair cost can be reached.

C. On August 16, 2013, at around 19:12, Defendant 1 found the victim E at the places indicated in the above paragraph (1) and destroyed the network by means of cutting down a knife by visiting a knife after a knife, thereby impairing its utility by destroying property equivalent to KRW 70,000 for repair cost.

On August 23, 2013, the Defendant found the victim E at the places described in the above paragraph (a) and divided the victim E, and then knife the knife by visiting the knife.