The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the judgment of the defendant shows an reflective appearance, such as the defendant's failure to repeat the crime of this case at the time of committing the crime of this case, and the situation where the defendant attempted to use the letter to the victim late, and the mental illness of the defendant seems to have partly affected the crime of this case.

On the other hand, the defendant has continuously exercised violence and caused considerable mental pain to the victim. The reason and method of the crime are poor, the victim is still not out of shock, and the defendant has been punished for the same kind of violence in the past, and the defendant has been punished for the same kind of violence in the past.

As above, the lower court appears to have determined the sentence by comprehensively taking into account the favorable and unfavorable circumstances against the Defendant, while it is reasonable to respect the sentence in cases where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion (see Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In so doing, there is no express change in special circumstances to the extent that the lower court’s punishment would be changed, and in full view of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character, behavior, career, health condition, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it does not seem to be unreasonable to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unfair because it goes beyond the reasonable

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.