The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the original court (six months of imprisonment) shall be too vague and unfair.

2. Although the Defendant appears to reflect on the fact that the injured victim is the aged aged, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties by fraudulent means is an offense that undermines the function of the State by obstructing the exercise of legitimate public authority, and thus requires strict punishment, the injury has not been recovered, the Defendant’s previous and seven times, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.