The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and by a fine of ten thousand won.

The above fine shall be imposed on the defendant.

According to the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of the legal principle), according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, since it is recognized that the defendant had been abroad in order to escape criminal punishment against the facts charged in this case, the statute of limitations has

The judgment of the court below which pronounced acquittal on the ground that the statute of limitations has not been suspended, shall be erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

On July 17, 1997 (U.K.) the period of stay in Korea during the period of stay in Korea on July 23, 1997 (U.K.) the date of entry into the country of departure from the country of origin on July 23, 1997 (Spanish) the Defendant appears to be a Spain via France at the time.

On July 22, 2008, 46 days 46 days 4, 208 September 6, 2008 (Spanish) the Defendant appears to be between Spain via France at that time.

2010.3.11. 504일 30일 6 2010.4.9.( 스페인) 2011.1.20. 286일 57일 7 2011.3.18.( 스페인) 2012.7.30. 500일 30일 8 2012.8.29.( 스페인) 2012.10.23. 55일 505일 9 2014.3.12.( 스페인) 2014.3.18. 6일 37일 10 2014.4.24.( 스페인) 2014.5.16. 22일 원심은, 그 판시와 같은 사실 및 사정들을 종합하여 볼 때, 아래《 표》 연번 1, 2번의 국외 체류는 형사처분을 면할 목적을 가지고 출국하였다는 점이 인정되어 2017. 2. 8.까지 공소 시효가 연장되지만, 같은《 표》 연번 3 내지 10번의 국외 체류기간 동안은 피고인이 ‘ 형사처분을 면할 목적’ 을 가지고 출국하였다는 점이 증명되었다고

As it is difficult to see that the instant facts charged after February 8, 2017, for which the statute of limitations expired, sentenced the Defendant to be acquitted on the grounds that the statute of limitations expired.

The key issue of this case is by Article 5 of the former Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (amended by Act No. 8366 of April 11, 2007).