logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.12.18 2014나30500
가맹비 등 반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: “A evidence submitted in the court of first instance that is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion is rejected; “No. 7” evidence submitted in the court of first instance is as follows; “The Plaintiff entered into a franchise store contract with Seowon Distribution Co., Ltd. and the store of this case on May 6, 2012; and ④ except for adding “The Plaintiff entered into a franchise store contract with Seowon Distribution Co., Ltd. and the store of this case”; and thus, it is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.”

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow