The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Inasmuch as the present value of the apartment site used by the victim is KRW 1.50,000,000,000, the market price of the apartment site used by the victim was only KRW 2-30,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

The judgment of the court below which determined the seal is unfair.

The apartment door of the victim with the misunderstanding of the legal principles has been too old so that the U.S. did not damage the apartment door due to the defendant's falling, and the flexible scarcitys used by the defendant are simply removed from a full fluor, thereby impairing the utility of the defendant's falling act.

subsection (b) of this section.

The Defendant merely written a written statement on the front door to contact the victim who wishes to receive a lease deposit from the injured party (the Defendant asserted on the ground of mistake of facts and legal principles on the date of the first trial held in the first instance trial held in the above trial). According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court on the argument of misunderstanding the facts (in particular, the list Nos. 7, 11 of the evidence) in the judgment of the lower court, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court on the victim’s apartment entrance, the Defendant fell away from the victim’s apartment entrance, and then restored the front door to the front door, and then the Defendant re-explosed the front door with a flexible pen, and then the Defendant re-explosed the front door to the two sides of the front door and the door, the estimate of painting construction work to cover 18,000 won (per 8,000 won, labor cost of KRW 180,000,000) and 200,000 won (per 20,0).200).

In submitting evidence No. 1, the Defendant asserted that, on July 7, 2016, from H to H, a company preparing written estimates, the Defendant did not perform construction of the victim’s apartment door-to-door painting, so the lower judgment, which recognized the cost of painting as KRW 220,00,00, is unreasonable. However, the above repair cost is not necessarily required to be recognized as the actual cost of expenditure, but is each of the instant cases according to the above facts recognized.