logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2013.07.03 2012고합44
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 19, 2007, the defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving) in the official capital support of the Daejeon District Court. On October 30, 2007, the above court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime; on April 12, 2010, in the official capital support of the Daejeon District Court, on April 12, 2010, the summary order of KRW 6 million was issued, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 24, 2012, at around 03:36, the Defendant driven a Cingcon vehicle without a driver’s license, in a section of approximately 500 meters from the front of a restaurant in the name of the new Sinju-dong, to the front of an official prison in the Sinju-dong, from the front of the same Sinju-dong to the front of the Sinju-dong, without a driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. Registers of driver's licenses, and car4;

1. A report on detection of a de facto driver (blood collection result);

1. Records before judgment: Application of criminal records, etc. and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed on a violation of the Road Traffic Act of heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (hereinafter referred to as the following sentencing factors) and the fact that a person was prosecuted during the period of the suspended sentence of a person who was not a licenseless driver (two years of suspended sentence in June) finalized on May 28, 201, but the period of suspended sentence is the same as that of the defendant's failure to appear without justifiable grounds, and is against the distance of driving and the distance.

arrow