Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On November 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act from the Suwon Franchisor method, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 28, 2016.

If necessary for national health, the Minister of Food and Drug Safety may determine and publicly announce the standards for labeling food or food additives for sale or for labeling of advanced apparatus, containers and packages, the standards and specifications of which are determined, and accordingly, he/she shall not sell foods, import, display or transport such foods for sale, or use them for business, unless the standards for labeling are indicated.

Nevertheless, from September 2013 to March 15, 2015, the Defendant sold food to the city without indicating the distribution deadline, ingredients content indication, and “illegal or inferior food report” on a container in which other water used by the Defendant in the wife B from September 23, 2013 to March 23, 2015, in which other water used by the Defendant, which is a food, is stored, and without indicating the source of manufacturing, location indication, food type and extracted food type.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Recording of witness D's statements in the third public trial records;

1. A photo of the outer cover for melting;

1. A certificate;

1. A certificate of registration of livestock breeding business;

1. Business registration certificate;

1. Business registration certificate;

1. Photographs;

1. Investigation report (attached to a public notice related to the Food Sanitation Act);

1. Previous conviction: Determination of the issue of inquiry into criminal records and criminal investigation records

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that they sold food as they were, but there is no fact that they sold any food produced or processed (productions for melting).

The defendant has sold melting itself and provided the customer who purchased the following melting services to pack melting the melting volume and deliver the melting volume to the customer.