A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 4, 2017, the Defendant insultingd in Asan City B, around 00:50, at the street, and “C” in front of the D intersection, and the Defendant fighting.

The phrase “a taxi engineer or drinking person raises a trial fee” means a defect in the police officer, such as a slope F, etc., who was called up after receiving 112 a report, in order to verify the details of the report and the details of damage, etc. by the police officer, such as a slope F, etc., under the influence of alcohol, such as a taxi engineer G, and a person working for the defendant, etc., and the victim F, who was the victim, “I am young, the head of the youth,” and the victim F;

Along with the large sound, “hacker, Chewing,” the victim F was openly insulting.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the date and time set forth in the above 1. Paragraph 1., and at the same place, the security guards belonging to the same police box, while taking the above bath, could be punished as a crime of insult. In that sense, the Defendant took the above H’s part as a police official, thereby hindering the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the said H, which is a police official.

3. The Defendant, at around 01:00 on June 4, 2017, destroyed goods used by public offices, thereby impairing their utility by walking three times the locker box of the Asan Police Station Efers, which was locked in the course of arresting a flagrant offender at the Asan Police Station Efers located in Asan City, as seen above, in the course of carrying out the e-scoping to the E-scoping box, at around 00, at the Asan Police Station Efers of the Asan Police Station Efers of the Asan Police Station, which were locked three times along with the locker’s entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. G statements;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning a report on investigation (a written estimate) and a written estimate;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for each type of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.