The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is to remove the toilet building owned by another person without the permission of the owner, and the quality of the crime is not less than that of the defendant, and the court below seems to have sentenced the punishment (2 million won) reduced than that of the summary order (3 million won) considering the favorable circumstances for the defendants, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendants, and there is no change of circumstances that may vary between the court below and the punishment, and there is no agreement with the victim or no recovery of damage until the trial at the trial at the trial, and other factors that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive, means and method of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.