Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 19, 2014, around 20:30, the Defendant: (a) committed an injury on the part of the Victim F (hereinafter “E”) in front of the restaurant located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, on one occasion, that the Victim F (hereinafter “E”) does not listen to his horse well; (b) committed an injury, such as an open room, etc. in which treatment for ten (10) days is required; and (c) assaulted the Victim C(46) of the said F’s husband C(hereinafter “F”) on the back part of the next son.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statements of witnesses C and F in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Statements made by witnesses G in the second trial records;

1. Statement made by a witness H in the fourth trial record;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (No. 2 of the evidence list);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion under Articles 32 (1) 3 and 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits, etc. of Application for Compensation Orders (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448,

1. The assertion F and C together with the Defendant’s bath, and the Defendant dump bumped together with a dump, and the Defendant dumpeded and her bumped, and the Defendant dumpeded with F’s face. The Defendant did not intend to inflict injury on F, or even if not, do not so.

Even if the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate act by passive resistance.

2. In the police investigation, the Defendant stated that F and C had been taking the desire to commit an assault against the Defendant, and that F and C did not use the assault against the Defendant. In such circumstances, the Defendant inflicted an injury on F by harming F.