1. The defendant's statement of the loan case against the plaintiff is based on Seoul Central District Court 2007Da317661.

1. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 4 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, it is recognized that the Plaintiff fully repaid to the Defendant the obligation pursuant to the conciliation protocol of the Seoul Central District Court 2007Da317661 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant conciliation protocol”) around July 2015.

According to the above facts, since the defendant's claims under the conciliation protocol of this case are all extinguished, compulsory execution under the conciliation protocol of this case shall not be permitted.

2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.