logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.05.14 2020고정151
사기
Text

A fine of KRW 1,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On April 9, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court on April 17, 2015 and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 17, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

“ 2020 Highly 151”

1. On March 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00 on March 19, 2018, the victim D within the “C golf course” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu; (b) sold a total of KRW 1,685,000 to KRW 1,90,000,000 in the total amount of KRW 1,500,000,000,000, for the golf debt pool to be sold to the victim D, “a golf course project implementer and dives (project project implementer)” (hereinafter “C golf course”). In short, the Defendant changed the payment of KRW 1,685,000 in the golf debt other than the said amount.”

However, even if the defendant receives golf loans, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the golf bonds to the victim.

Around March 20, 2018, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 1,685,000 to a company bank account in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of golf loans.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1,685,00, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 215,000.

"20, 154"

2. On January 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would offer money from KRW 5 million to KRW 2 times to KRW 10 million if he/she lent the land to the Gyeongwon-si Office of F building in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si.” On the other hand, the Defendant concluded that “The Defendant would offer money from KRW 5 million to KRW 2 times to KRW 10 million if he/she lent the land to the Gyeongnam-gu, Gyeongwon-si.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had a debt equivalent to KRW 40 million with I, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt even if he borrowed money from the victim because he was able to use the money for living expenses, not for the purchase price of the land.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such and belongs to it from the victim.

arrow