logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.09.19 2014고정777
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around September 20, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would make a long-term entertainment in the telecom and pay accommodation expenses after one week” to the victim at the Damoel operated by the victim C in Daegu Seo-gu, Seo-gu.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay accommodation expenses to the above Moel because of the lack of certain occupation and income at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, did not pay accommodation charges of KRW 300,000 from that time to the 30th day of the same month.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

The Defendant is a person who receives a daily allowance from a Chinese restaurant and works as a delivery employee.

1. On March 14, 201, the Defendant: (a) agreed to work at the G restaurant operated by the victim F, Daegu-gu Seoul-gu, as the delivery source; (b) provided that, if the Defendant borrowed KRW 2,50,000,000,000,000,000 should be paid in advance, every month, while working on the G restaurant.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay for the debt such as card debt, etc. which is approximately KRW 20 million, with the intention to work continuously as an employee.

Accordingly, the Defendant received 2.5 million won in cash from the victim.

2. Between March 14, 2011 and March 24, 2011, the Defendant: (a) performed the work as a delivery agent at the pertinent Chinese branch; and (b) provided that he/she would complete payment with paying off the money, who is in the face of the instant Chinese branch.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the unpaid amount while working as the delivery source of Chinese collection.

Accordingly, the defendant received 2.80,000 won from the victim on three occasions, and acquired it by fraud.

The Defendant of the 2014 Highly 779 [2014 Highly 779] On January 2, 2010, at the J restaurant operated by the victim I, “one million won in advance” to the victim at the monthly salary of each week.

arrow