The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (an order to attend a law-abiding driving course of two years and forty hours under the suspended sentence of ten months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: although the defendant's mistake is recognized and is against depth and living conditions are difficult; the defendant committed the crime to protect A, which was committed at the time. While there are circumstances to consider the motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., the defendant has already been punished by a fine for several times due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and thus, the defendant's act of aiding and abetting and abetting the defendant's life and body as well as his/her driver; the crime of aiding and abetting and abetting the crime is a crime interfering with the criminal justice action; the crime of aiding and abetting the defendant is a crime interfering with the criminal justice action; the crime of aiding and abetting the defendant is deemed to be bad, and the motive and circumstance leading up to each of the crimes in this case, the circumstances before and after the crime, the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation, and family relationship, etc. are considered, it cannot be deemed that the punishment of the defendant sentenced by the court below is too inappropriate.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.