Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 1, 2017, the Defendant visited “C”, which is an Internet private gambling site, and deposited 6 million won in the name of “B” account in the name of the Defendant, and deposited 6 million won in the name of “B” account (E) of the above gambling site, and deposited the money at the above gambling site, and deposited the money at the above gambling site, and then deposited the money at the above gambling site (the game in which the sum of the number of the cards received respectively by 2 to 3 card and the number of the cards was close to 9). From that time to January 7, 2018, the Defendant deposited 2.5 billion won in the total of 2.5 billion won in the form of betting as shown in the [Attachment 2.5 billion won in the form of betting by predicting the side between display and banking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on investigation (the amount used for each crime and report on confirmation of the frequency of crimes), application of the details of transactions (A) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the main sentence of Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 10 million won;

2. Application of the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria are not set. 3. Circumstances are to be taken into account that the accused who made the sentencing decisions fully acknowledges and reflects the crimes.

However, the instant gambling amount is a large amount. Considering that the Defendant committed gambling from February 15, 2016 to February 15, 2017, and the Defendant continued to commit the instant crime without entirely opposing the fact that he/she was issued a summary order on July 31, 2017 (the Defendant was gambling on the date on which the said summary order was issued), the Defendant’s liability is considerably heavy.

. The above.