1. All plaintiffs' lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Plaintiff A entered the Department of Honorable Treatment of C University on March 2, 2012, and Plaintiff B on March 2, 2009, respectively. At present, the Plaintiffs currently are students who are enrolled in the main department of the same college and the fourth year (seven semesters). The Defendant is the president of Cuniversity.

B. The Plaintiffs received the F credits in the first subject of contagious disease study in around 2016, which was the second and second years, and in the number of major subjects.

C. The Plaintiffs, in the application for taking the first semester around February 2018, 2018, are the number D, 3 credits, and faculty in charge of the “contagious Disease 1” class D, 3 credits, and 201.

E. hereinafter “instant subject”

(D) Around April 18, 2018, the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs that the instant subject would be subject to the revocation of the instant subject due to overlap between the instant subject and the class hours of the instant subject (hereinafter “instant revocation notice”).

(a) [Ground for recognition: entry of Gap, as evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 4, 8, 12, and Eul as evidence of subparagraphs 5 through 7;

2. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion was normal acceptance of the application for taking part in the subject of this case, which is a major essential subject, and the above subjects were taken, but the defendant unilaterally notified the plaintiffs of the cancellation of the course in this case without any ground, and thereby the plaintiffs not only became unable to obtain a bachelor's degree in medical colleges in February of the year, but also suffered disadvantages that could not apply for the national qualifying examination for veterinarians.

It should be cancelled against the illegal disposition that violates the rights to receive classes and violates the principle of trust protection and proportionality.

3. We examine the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' lawsuit ex officio in determining the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' lawsuit.

A lawsuit seeking the cancellation of an illegal administrative disposition is caused by an illegal disposition.