logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.28 2014고단627
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on June 13, 2014.

"2014 Highest 627" was a situation in which the Defendant opened a website in the Internet shopping mall, such as Round, and purchased TV and other provisional products from the agency, and purchased them through the Internet, and was in the business of returning them through the Internet, and thus, the Defendant was in a situation in which the Defendant himself/herself, his/her son, and his/her son, and the Applicant were using a credit card, so it was extremely unclear whether the payment for the goods purchased from the agency could be cancelled as agreed even if the Applicant, etc. sent the goods on the day of the promise or made the payment by the credit card of another person.

1. On February 9, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C (Nam, 39 years of age) (hereinafter “LG TV”) who reported and contacted online shopping mall advertisements, that “I will pay credit card numbers and validity period if you are off, and deliver goods at least two weeks thereafter.”

On the same day, the Defendant identified the victim’s nominal credit card (on-site card) number and validity period from the victim, and settled KRW 1.7 million from the “LGestest Shop agency as the price for goods.”

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to 1.7 million won of card use.

2. On March 17, 2012, the Defendant calls from the victim D (Nam, 37 years of age) who was a customer who purchased TV through the Defendant, prior to that time, and did not provide “3D satisf and radio Internet equipment,” which was promised as a satisfy against TV that was previously purchased,” and sent to the Defendant, who had promised to purchase more than one television at a time before settling the price by credit card;

3.2

arrow