logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.10.07 2013고합380
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 27, 1997, the defendant was sentenced to the suspension of indictment for larceny, etc. at the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office, and on May 29, 200, the Incheon District Court sentenced on May 29, 200 to imprisonment for a maximum of one year and six months, a short of one year and six months, a special larceny, etc. at the same court on June 10, 2002; one year of imprisonment for a special larceny, etc. at the same court on March 11, 2004; one year and six months from the same court on September 15, 2006; and one year and six months from the imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the same court on December 11, 2008, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 31, 2012.

On March 26, 2013, the Defendant used a gap in the E-gu, Jung-gu, Incheon, in which the proprietor of the E-gu, Jung-gu, Incheon, is influor, and used the gap in which the Kabrter is influor, and carried out a Mactor in which the victim F is influort 12,00,000,000 won in the market value of the victim’s 17,000,000,000 won in 17,000,000,000,000 won in the market value.

As a result, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property worth 7.2 million won in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Photographs of damaged articles and the location of damaged articles;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, results of search of consolidated cases, judgment, and attachment of personal identification and confinement status;

1. Although the defendants habitually committed the act of theft as stated in the facts charged, they asserted that it is not due to habitual nature, and thus does not constitute a habitual larceny. However, considering the records of each crime, the frequency and contents of the crime, the period until the crime of this case was committed after release, and the motive, means, and methods of the crime of this case, the defendants committed the crime of this case in full.

arrow