logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.08.22 2018나303101
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant and C came to know with the radiation of the Daegu Health University, and came to know of each other. From September 2001, the Defendant and C repeated the Hague and Maman.

After having become aware of the defendant since 2005, the plaintiff, who is the latter part of the defendant and C, visited with the defendant and C by offering a teaching service with the defendant during the period heed with C.

B. Around April 2010, the Defendant stated to the Plaintiff that “The F should grant money to the Plaintiff because the F should have caused an accident,” and the Plaintiff lent KRW 33 million to the Defendant on April 28, 2010.

C. On June 10, 2010, C proposed to the Plaintiff that “the Defendant borrowed KRW 33 million from the Plaintiff, making it difficult for the Plaintiff. In order to reduce the Defendant’s burden, C paid the Plaintiff the above KRW 33 million by subrogation,” and “the Defendant borrowed KRW 33 million from the Plaintiff on April 30, 2010. The amount of the present loan was repaid to the Plaintiff on June 10, 2010, and written confirmation of debt performance (No. 1; hereinafter “the instant certificate of debt performance”) stating that “I will prepare the certificate and raise any objection after the said amount of the loan was paid,” and on the same day, the Plaintiff again affixed his seal on the side of the Plaintiff’s name, affixed it to C, and then delivered it to C, but the Plaintiff or the Defendant actually borrowed KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff.

On November 15, 2010, the Plaintiff leased KRW 10 million to the Defendant on the same day after cancelling the term deposit with the National Bank in the name of the Plaintiff.

E. On March 8, 2011, the Plaintiff stated to the Defendant that “The Defendant, without being reimbursed KRW 33 million from C, affixed the instant certificate of repayment and delivered it to C.” In this regard, the Plaintiff sent the NA message with the following content as the C on March 8, 201.

C : Baz. Maz. Maz.

our country.

arrow