logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.05.18 2017고단531
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 9, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) caused a traffic accident that conflicts with the boundary stone located at the scambing seat while driving a C-be in the front direction of the Song-gu Police Station in the front direction of the 1145 Sin-si, Jinjin-gu, Jeoncheon-gu, with drinking-gu, and driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol and drinking on the face, from the slope of the D police station of the Jeoncheon-gu, Police Station, which called the scene, by driving the C-be in the front direction of the 1145-gu, with drinking alcohol, and driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

A request for the measurement of drinking for a reasonable reason to determine a person, from that time until 03:36 of the same day, was received by the D police box located in the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City on the same day for the continuous measurement of drinking, but the police officer did not comply with a request for the measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.

2. On December 9, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the ground that F of the police box affiliated with the D, who refuses to measure drinking, as described in paragraph (1), took a smartphone, as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the said police officer, such as “samp, flap, e, poph, poph, poph, flap, e, the police flap; (b) flap; (c) flap, flap; and (d) f of the F f head, f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., and f., f., f., f., f., f.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site reports (related to on-site situations), investigation reports (recording a voice recording the confirmation of a driver of first drinking alcohol by a witness G), investigation reports (related to refusal to measure drinking), traffic accident actual condition investigation reports, and drivers of drinking alcohol;

arrow