beta
Text
1. At the same time, the Defendant received KRW 20,000,000 from the Plaintiff, and as to the building indicated in the attached list from the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant had maintained de facto marital relations from around 2005 and repeated the Plaintiff’s birth again. On September 1, 2013, the Defendant drafted to the Plaintiff a letter as follows:
(1) According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the establishment of a collective security right and the establishment of a new collective security right and the establishment of a new collective security right and the establishment of a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right and a new collective security right.
The contents of the above notes are not discussed as a legal issue.
After that, the plaintiff and the defendant arranged de facto marital relations, on the other hand, after arranging de facto marital relations, the plaintiff gave 85 million won in total to the defendant from the time of the closing of the argument in this case.
2. The assertion of the parties;