logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2021.01.15 2020고단2429
공무집행방해
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2020, at around 00:58, the Defendant, at the residence of the Defendant in Jeju-si B, reported that the Defendant 112 was frighting, and was dispatched by the police officers, who called the Defendant, transferred it to the Emergency Center for the Jeju-si Medical Center.

피고인은 2020. 9. 13. 04:22 경 위 응급센터에서 제주 서부 경찰서 E 지구대 소속 순경 F(24 세 )에게 “ 술이 깼으니 집에 데려다줘. ”라고 요청하여 F으로부터 “ 안 취했으면 혼자 걸어 보세요.

“Along with the word “Along with the walking,”

“In doing so, the F was assaulted by 3 times the f’s chest part by hand, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the protective measures for the f’s leader.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Partial statement of the suspect examination protocol against the defendant prepared by the police;

1. Statement made to the F in the police record;

1. A report on investigation into police preparation (including additional documents and images of CCTV at the center in charge of a DNA hospital);

1. Entry of report processing list 112, each of the police preparation; and

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute of the related photograph;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. 【The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order 【The scope of the applicable sentences under the law 【The sentence of punishment of 50,000 won to 10,000 won” 【The sentence of 3 million won to 50,000 won: Violence against police officers is deemed to be an unjustifiable challenge against the State’s public authority; the Defendant directly exercises the power to directly use the body of the victimized police officer; the Defendant appears to have recognized and divided the Defendant’s mistake; the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol; and the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime.

arrow