logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.22 2017나2028441
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the court shall dismiss “this court” under the 6th sentence of the 4th judgment of the court of the first instance as “court of the first instance”; and (b) the court’s decision is identical to that of the court of the first instance, except for addition of the following original judgment, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 42

2. The plaintiff's argument in the grounds of appeal to the effect that even if the plaintiff pointed out or additionally submitted the evidence Nos. 10, 11, or 12 through 15, it is insufficient to view that the plaintiff suffered damages by fraudulent acts of deception by the defendant, etc., such as the plaintiff's assertion, which caused the plaintiff to pay to the company bank 278,476,320 won, due to fraudulent acts of deception by the defendant, etc., and otherwise, there is no evidence to reverse the recognition or judgment of facts in the above quoted part related to this part, and there is no other evidence to reverse the recognition or judgment of facts

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow