A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-to-car.

1. Around 00:50 on February 8, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the death or injury caused by dangerous driving) (hereinafter “the Act”), even though it is difficult to drive the said vehicle normally due to the influence of drinking, such as drinking, by driving the said vehicle, and driving it along three lanes prior to the D convenience store located in Busan-gun C, Busan-gun.

Since there is a lot of traffic of vehicles near the intersection, there was a duty of care to thoroughly operate the operation of the vehicle and to accurately manipulate the steering and steering system of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and thereby neglected to do so, was driven by the victim E (the age of 37) who was in the atmosphere of the above signal in the same direction, and was driven by the lower part of the FK7 car that was driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant driven the said low-priced car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered from the injury of the victim E, the victim G(39 years of age) and the same H(6 years of age) for about two weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) was demanded by the Defendant to respond to a measurement of alcohol by inserting the breath in a breath in a breath test, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, drinking, and driving a breath of body, etc., by reporting the occurrence of the said traffic accident at the above time and at the above location, by I from

Nevertheless, the defendant avoided this and did not comply with the police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E: 1.1.