logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2016.01.12 2015나10272
배분이의
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified according to the amendment of the claim in the trial as follows. A.

In the lawsuit of this case.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff and the defendant's assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion

1. The defendant's claim that should be preferentially apportioned to the defendant pursuant to Article 2 (1) 1 of the Agreement on the Partial Transfer of Mortgage: The principal of non-guaranteed loan claims as of the date of allocation of the public auction procedure in this case: 1,59,79,000 won: interest accrued after the commencement of 14,147,298 won (interest calculated at the rate of 7.5% per annum, which is the interest rate after the commencement of the rehabilitation plan approved from October 26, 2009 to December 31, 2012): overdue interest (the interest calculated at the rate of 380,396,350 won after the maturity of the non-guaranteed loan principal from January 1, 2013 to November 13, 2013; KRW 19,147, KRW 396, KRW 2984, KRW 2986, KRW 196, KRW 2984, KRW 2986, KRW 2964, KRW 29684,20684).

2. The Defendant’s claim that should be given priority to the Defendant pursuant to Article 2.1.2 of the Agreement 2.3.2. 1. 2. 7. 2. 1. 7. 2. 7. 4. 2. 7. 8. 1. 2. 7. 8. 5. 2. 1. 7. 1. 5. 6. 2. 7. 8. 2. 1. 7. 5. 2. 1. 7. 1. 1. 5,541, 479. 13, 621. 1. 1. 7. 4. 5. 2. 7. annually 9. 2. 95. 2. 7. 2. 5. 205. 205. 196. 7. 7. 1. 205 annually 17. 2008. 26. 206. 15 155. 20. 1555. 20. 3. 20. 20555 annually

arrow