Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant D Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D Construction”).

victim E is the former director of corporation, and victim E is the F construction corporation (hereinafter referred to as “F construction”).

is the manager of the company.

around 07:00 on October 18, 2013, the Defendant “H” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G (hereinafter “instant building”).

On December 10, 2012, the victim E performed the right of retention on the container, etc. installed at the above site from around December 10, 2012 due to the lack of construction cost, which caused the victim E’s interference with the victim’s exercise of the right of retention by force, such as mobilization of the members from the above site to take away the container office installed at the site without permission, mobilization of the security guards from the site, removal of the F construction employees from the site, removal of the container office installed at the site from the site, removal of the F construction employees from the site, removal of the type of the F construction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness I, J, K and L;

1. Each statement on P of a witness among the witness E, witness M, N,O, and the five-time public trial records in the third public trial records;

1. Statement made by the prosecutor with respect to L;

1. A written contract for construction works, a detailed statement, a written request for the payment of construction works, a written request for and details thereof, each content certificate, a lien report, each site photograph, each patrol officer's work site, each contract for construction works, subcontract, agreement on construction works, other agreements on construction works, losses incurred by delay in the temporary reexamination, the quantity of the temporary re-explosion, each photograph, tax invoice, tax invoice, physical article, contract for lease, performance of agreement, each written judgment [the defendant and defense counsel did not occupy the site of the construction works, and thus did not interfere with the defendant's exercise of the right of retention by the victim as they did not establish a lien;

The argument is asserted.

According to the evidence above, Q Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Q Construction”)

R. October 201.