The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Around 20:00 on October 1, 201, the Defendant, within the main point of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jongno-gu and the second floor “D”, was aware of the victim E (n't, 49 years of age) who was in a relationship with the previous wife, and was fluenced by one hand, set up the victim's head debt with one hand, cut down the victim's head debt, cut down the victim's body with one hand, and embling the part of the victim's neck, thereby leading the victim to approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. The defendant's assertion and judgment are as follows: (a) the date and time and place indicated in the facts charged from the investigative agency to the court; and (b) the victim tried to knife the defendant and to prevent him from doing so; and (c) the victim did not have inflicted any injury on him as stated in the facts charged

As evidence consistent with the facts charged in this case, the victim's statement at the investigative agency and this court and each injury diagnosis report (the investigation record 1.24,25 pages), the upper part of the investigation record (the investigation record 1.28 through 35 pages, 2 rights 13 through 19 pages of the investigation record) are located.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record are as follows: ① The name of sick person written in the injury diagnosis report submitted by the victim (i.e., e., fluoral and tension base and tension base, brain salvine and salvine surface, salvine surface, salvine surface and open upper part (e.g., the front part, left part, the left part, the inner part, etc.). The victim has both arms, the left part, the left part, the left part, and the victim claims that the victim had been aware of the victim's salvbbly, and the upper part is not inconsistent with the victim's salvbba; ② the victim was diagnosed at the hospital for the first time on October 31, 2011 after the date of the occurrence of the instant case. Thus, the victim suffered injury as stated in the above injury diagnosis report due to any other reasons than the instant case.