A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (the age of 48) are married married couple around January 7, 1990.

Around 01:00 on September 14, 2015, the Defendant discovered the victim's cell phone report while drinking alcohol together with the victim, son E, etc. at the D restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and changed the victim's cell phone but was rejected, the Defendant was found to have taken off the victim's cell phone through E, and collected it on the floor.

The Defendant listened to the word “Ieman도요” from E, and sent the face part of E in drinking, she pusheds the victim’s chest part of his chest, her fingers, and her body over the floor. The Defendant saw the victim’s body over the floor.

The Defendant continuously got off the body of the victim who suffered approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim, including the chest, shoulder, and the dives of the father of the luxa.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of B and E;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Training [Scope of Recommendation] General Injury (General Bodily Injury) Type 1 (No special person) (No person in April-1 and June): 4-1 year: The defendant first denied the assault against the victim, and asked for the crime of this case in April-1 and June (the decision of sentence]. The defendant was aware that the defendant had observed the scene while denying the assault against the victim, and did not show that there was any justifiable evidence or reason on the face of the defendant's personal identification even if the defendant had bullyingd the victim with his personal identification. The victim would maintain the family of mixed person without his/her intention to maintain his/her family, and would easily respond to divorce.