A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year, who is sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court on November 21, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 21, 2012. On January 6, 2012, the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 19, 2012 after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for the same crime by the same court, and on January 21, 2011, the said judgment became final and conclusive after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the same court on July 26, 2010.

1. On April 8, 2008, the Defendant: (a) around 401 GG office located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF building; (b) on January 1, 2008, the officially announced value of the forest land in Gangwon-gun H (hereinafter “the forest land”); and (c) on January 1, 2008, the forest land in this case is limited to KRW 1,880 per square meter; and even if the forest land is sold to the victim I, the Defendant did not have an intent or capacity to purchase KRW 7,00,000 per square meter (3.3 square meters) from the victim after 6 months, without the victim’s intention or capacity to purchase the forest land, there is a high possibility that the market value of the forest land in this case will be KRW 500,000 per square meter; and (d) the forest land will be purchased at KRW 98,000,000 per square meter after 6 months in the front rice complex; and (d) on deposit from the victim’s account in the same month.

2. In early August 2008, the Defendant: (a) was prepared to lend all of the bid price of the real estate to a third party, and (b) the fact is difficult to sell to a third party on the grounds that there is no road on which Gangwon-do Crossing-gun K and 18 lots (hereinafter “this case’s real estate”); and (c) at the time, the Defendant was anticipated to incur approximately KRW 800 million in total, including bank loans, etc. (see, e.g., an error and partly revised the facts charged). The bid price of the real estate in this case was also lent to a third party, and thus, the intent or ability to repay it within the period agreed upon by the victim even if it was borrowed money from the third party.