The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant reflects the mistake while making a confession of the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment is considered favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have forged a real estate lease contract in which the deposit was increased with respect to the defendant's residence for the purpose of preparing funds for the purchase of multi-stage goods, and deceiving the victim as if the defendant had ability to repay by means of delivering it to the victim as collateral, etc. In light of the criminal law, contents, and the amount of fraud, etc., the crime of this case is deemed to be inferior and heavy in light of the nature of the crime, the situation after the crime is not good, the defendant has not taken any particular measures to recover damage yet, and all of the sentencing conditions in the argument of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, and family environment, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.