A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall, while under the influence of alcohol, engage in a riotous or disorderly act by uttering or doing rough words or conducts at a public office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from around 19:30 on August 19, 2018 to 20:00 on the same day, found a taxi engineer and a Si guard under the influence of alcohol in the districts located in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu B, Incheon, for the purpose of finding mutual agreement points between the C District guard D, but without any justifiable reason, he was aware that the C District guard D was able to find the same.

B. Around 30 minutes of disturbance was flick and flick in the government offices by putting a bath in a large amount of flick fl.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Revocation of a week;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant only made a statement of resistance against the illegal treatment of police officers.

However, according to the above evidence, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, continued not to have a police officer who spawns home and spawns home at several times after the taxi engineer and spawn were in the instant district.

The court may recognize the fact that the disturbance has been disturbed and slicked within the district of this case, even after receiving a warning that the disturbance may be arrested as a flagrant offender in the form of sound and the cancellation of the state of the government office.

The Defendant collected that the taxi engineer, who was a Si guard, returned the taxi to the location on which he was on board the taxi, and did not respond to the police officer's statement that he would have a large number of taxis in Seoul, or that he would directly take the taxi in Seoul, and was unable to escape a disturbance within the earth. In light of the Defendant's attitude, statement, etc. on video, the Defendant does not seem to have made a legitimate objection.

Therefore, the defendant and defense counsel's assertion is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, and the Punishment of Minor Offenses selective to be sentenced;