beta
Text
1. The defendant
A. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 80,91,120 and KRW 34,710,480 among them, KRW 46,280,640 from March 1, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant’s status as a F University and G University were merged on February 2013 and opened to H University on March 1, 2014. The Defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates the said university.
B. On March 1, 2009, Plaintiff A was appointed as a full-time lecturer with the F University Health Management Department and Non-Retirement Prize, Plaintiff B as a full-time lecturer with the F University Management Department on March 1, 2010, and Plaintiff C as a full-time lecturer with the F University on March 1, 2010, and as a full-time lecturer with the F University on March 1, 2010, the Plaintiff D was changed to the H University on March 1, 2014. 2) on January 1, 2014.
C. The defendant's notice of expiration of the term of appointment for plaintiffs A, B, and C is 1) The defendant's provision concerning the full-time faculty members of F University non-Retirement Force (hereinafter "F University non-Retirement Force Regulations").
(2) On November 21, 2014, following the resolution of the teachers’ personnel committee and the board of directors on November 27, 2014, Plaintiff A notified the said Plaintiff of the expiration of the term of appointment on February 28, 2015 pursuant to Article 4(4). (2) The Defendant notified the said Plaintiff of the expiration of the term of appointment on December 28, 2015, following the resolution of the board of directors on November 23, 2014. (3) The Defendant notified the Plaintiffs of the expiration of the term of appointment on December 26, 2015, on the ground that Plaintiff B and C’s expiration of the total six years of employment pursuant to Article 4(4) of the Regulations on the Appointment of Non-National Teachers of H University (hereinafter referred to as “Rules on Non-National Pension") and Article 4(4) of the Regulations on Non-National Employees of F University (hereinafter referred to as “Rules”).
(hereinafter referred to as the “each of the instant notifications”) D. D. notification of the expiry of each of the above plaintiffs.
The defendant's rejection disposition against the plaintiff D's re-election does not meet the requirements for re-election under Article 25 (2) 2 of the Regulation on the Personnel Management of H University Teachers (not less than average point of 70 points for teaching staff evaluation within the period of appointment).