logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.8.19.선고 2016고정1521 판결
업무방해
Cases

2016 Daz. 1521 Business Interference

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Prosecutor

○○ (Lawsuits) and ○○ (Public Trial)

Imposition of Judgment

August 19, 2016

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant fails to pay the above fine, the defendant shall be confined in the old house for the period calculated by converting 100,000 won into one day.

In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

Reasons

Facts of crime

On May 24, 2016: From 00 to 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s Gowon’s business operation by force by avoiding disturbance, such as raising disturbance from 00 to 15:0 on May 24, 2016 to 16:0 on the ground that the excess is not connected to the victim B’s ○○○○○○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ Ma. Mah. Hah, the Defendant was at the same time having caused the victim’s Gowon’s business operation

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A report on investigation (a CCTV investigation);

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines)

1. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Order of provisional payment;

Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Judges

Judges Park Jin-young

arrow