logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.21 2013고단5818
위계공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

At around 19:15 on March 6, 2014, the Defendant attempted to make a pair of sugars to D around 304 Dong 316. However, as D refused to do so, he collected a shot-ro shot-ro shot, cut the shot-ro shot at his own right shot, cut it into the police, and reported D to the effect that D had inflicted an injury on the Defendant.

Accordingly, at around 19:30 on March 6, 2014, the Defendant stated to the effect that “I am hick G belonging to the Felon Police Station in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and “I am hicking, because I am hicking, I am hicking,” the Defendant called “I am hicking, I am hicking,” and the Defendant stated to the effect that “I am hicking, I am hicking, so I will be punished.”

In this respect, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (Evidence No. 21);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 157, 153 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the criminal defendant repents his error);

1. The portion not guilty under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation (2013 Highest 5818);

1. The Defendant, in the absence of any special reason to request the police officer to send a false report to the summary of the facts charged, the Defendant had the police officer feel to make a false report.

At around 22:01 on August 20, 201, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol on the J Cargo Vehicles of the I driver, and (b) was under the influence of alcohol on the part of the I driver; (c) was under the influence of the I driver’s vehicle, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties by deceptive means by allowing the I to report the occurrence of a traffic accident to 112 report to the said I; and (d) by allowing the police officer to dispatch to the site.

2. Determination

A. According to the records of this case, the defendant alcoholic beverages.

arrow