A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against victim D;

A. On August 1, 2012, the Defendant stated that “F” offices located in Pyeongtaek-si’s credit business chain in Defendant’s operation that “F will pay the victim the cost of materials to the Plaintiff, as the members of G would have to pay the cost of materials to the Defendant.” If only 20 million won were to be leased, G would have to pay the cost of medical care in the amount of money after 2-3 months.”

However, in fact G was not a member of the fraternity operated by the defendant, and even if it borrowed money from the victim, it did not have the ability to pay the money with the time limit within two to three months.

The defendant received 19.5 million won from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

B. The Defendant, at the same place as before December 18, 2012, provided the victim with an extended amount of KRW 20 million on the part of the victim at the same time and place as before the preceding paragraph, and provided the victim with an extended amount on May 23, 2013.

5. up to 24. The phrase “I will complete payment.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to change the amount within the agreed time limit even if he borrowed the amount from the damaged person due to cumulative amounts and liabilities while operating the lending company and the lending company.

The defendant received 19.4 million won from the damaged person to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant on the same day and acquired it by fraud.

2. Fraud against victim H;

A. On February 6, 2013, the Defendant discussed that “A notary public on the second floor of Pyeongtaek-si I Building, who was on the second floor of the J Law Firm Office, provided, at K, through K, that “A notary public, who was on the second floor of Pyeongtaek-si, urgently needed to pay money to the victim within a few months, and who lent KRW 10 million to the victim.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to cumulative amounts and liabilities while operating the lending company, he/she did not have the intent or ability to change it within a short period.

The defendant obtained cash 10 million won from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

B. On February 2013, the Defendant, while getting on and moving a passenger car with the victim, “ Samsung Factory” to the victim.