1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court shall dismiss or add the Plaintiff’s argument as stated in Paragraph (2) below; and (b) other than the addition of the judgment on the Plaintiff’s argument added in the trial as stated in Paragraph (3), the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) therefore

2. The part of the High Court Decision No. 2010, which is dismissed or added, is referred to as “ELAD Construction” in Part 8, which is referred to as “ELAD Construction.”

Part 5 of the decision of the first instance court shall add "No. 10" to "No. 9-1 to 5" in Part 5 of the decision of the third instance.

On the 5th 7th 7th 10th 10th 10th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 10th 7th 7th 10th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 8

3. The Plaintiff’s assertion added in the trial room is consistently asserted that the Plaintiff is not obligated to pay the cost of fire recovery in the circumstances where the cause of the instant fire is not revealed even if the amount received from ATex was the name of the cost of fire recovery, and where the cause of the instant fire was not revealed.