A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2, 2013, at around 10:30 on June 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the victim F (the age 41) who was obstructing traffic due to vehicle traffic problems in front of a restaurant run by the Defendant in Daegu-gun-gun, by the Defendant; (b) threatened the victim with his/her hand while having been in a dispute with the victim; (c) threatened the victim with his/her hand; (d) bread the breath; and (e) assault the victim by making the breath of the victim’s breath;

2. On June 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) prepared a written complaint in the form A4 using a shot-type coloring pen for the purpose of having the said F take criminal punishment at the E-cafeteria operated by the Defendant in Daegu-gun D; (b) around June 10, 2013, the Defendant had a certified judicial scrivener, at the office of a certified judicial scrivener with whom it is impossible to know the trade name in the Daegu Suwon-gu Modong-dong-dong-gu-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-style-style

A written complaint does not contain an assault that the complainant f, on June 2, 2013, around 10:30 on the street in front of the E-cafeteria located in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, performed at least once by the complainant, but the complainant filed a false report at around 10:40 on June 2, 2013 that he/she had committed the above assault from the complainant and had the complainant punished for the purpose of having him/her criminal punishment. In this context, the Defendant punished the Defendant’s criminal punishment, as described in paragraph (1), was the content that “The Defendant f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

Nevertheless, on June 20, 2013, the Defendant submitted the above complaint to the police officer who is unable to know his name in the 16 Daegu Pacific Police Station civil petition office of the 16th Daegu Pacific Police Station as the Madung-si Central Madung-si, Madung-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1. Results of afforestation DNA recycling;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 156 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;